Bias in Young Children

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

There are currently 18 American states that restrict teaching about race, diversity, equity, and inclusion in children’s classrooms.

 This means that no one in those schools can talk about the factors in society that lead to or indicate racial inequity—for example, the fact that head teachers and principals are usually white and assistant teachers and aides are usually persons of color, and that these two groups have different responsibilities and powers.

Although most of us never notice or discuss this state of affairs, it is apparent to the children we care for—even 3-month-old babies—and it gives them many hours of adult behavior to study and copy. They notice our preferences and prejudices, how we organize the day, communicate with them, and choose books and activities.

“Their brains are tuned to remember and imitate what they see us do,” explain professors Andrew N. Meltzoff and Walter S. Gilliam. “Child development research shows that young children are finely attuned to cues about prestige, power, and social status,” and they use these observations to understand the world. Everything they see is accepted as true and shapes their own biases without any words being spoken. 

“Young children are social pattern detectors,” write Meltzoff and Gilliam. “They study our behavior and sometimes the nonverbal messages they receive aren’t always the ones we want to send…. When we exhibit biases in front of young children we’re instilling our biases in their minds.”

By the time they’re 3 or 4 years old, white children show a preference for white faces when they take part in experiments, and by age 4 or 5 they hold negative attitudes toward blacks and are less likely to have them as friends.

On the other hand, 3- or 4-year-old black children don’t share this preference for their own group and may even prefer faces of a more prestigious color.

In addition, by this time children have probably also absorbed the racial messages contained in television, movies, and YouTube. Did you know that 7 of 11 princesses in Disney productions are white?

Becoming aware of race in the U.S. 

Research tells us:

  • 3-month-olds prefer the faces of certain racial groups
  • 9-month-olds use race to categorize faces
  • 3-year-olds associate some racial groups with negative traits
  • 4-year-olds associate whites with wealth and higher status
  • Among 5-year-olds, race-based discrimination is widespread

Talking about race

When asked in a study by psychologists Jessica Sullivan, Leigh Wilton, and Evan P. Apfelbaum, adults thought children should be 5 years old before they brought up the subject of race. Many white parents avoided the topic altogether, telling children, “Skin color doesn’t matter,” or “We’re all the same on the inside,” or “It’s not polite to talk about that.”

 Sullivan believes this is a mistake. “Even if adults don’t talk about race, children will work to make sense of their world and will come up with their own ideas, which may be inaccurate or detrimental.” Wilton adds, “It can be difficult to undo racial bias once it takes root. Talking about race will only get more difficult as they get older.”

How can we approach bias?

Psychologists make these suggestions:  

  • First of all, be aware of the existence of bias. Children may show bias and preferences in their interactions or treat one another differently because of their race, ethnicity, or gender. Be on the lookout for a change in children’s behavior, for example if someone is uncharacteristically quiet, or chooses an unusual toy or playmate, or doesn’t want to come to the program. 
  • Don’t ignore bias. Instead use it as an inspiration for story selection, activities, and projects. Be sure the children understand that a person’s appearance is never an acceptable reason for teasing or rejecting someone. Respond at once to any biased comment, such as, “I don’t want to play with her. She walks funny.” Bring the group together later and help them to realize that everyone speaks or walks differently. Ask, “How would you feel if…”, “Can you say more about…?” “Why do you think this happened?” This helps the children to think about gender roles and other biases. 
  • Remember that adults—you included—are models for how children react to one another. Understanding your own preferences and biases will help you to figure out whether there’s social bias in your classroom.  
  • Keep in mind that it takes time to change patterns of thinking so dealing with bias will be a gradual process for everyone. 
  • Make your classroom a showplace for diversity. Because most of us work in programs where the children are all from the same culture or are all the same color, it is extra important to introduce diversity in a positive way, counter stereotypes, and help the children appreciate the differences found in the real world. Display images of all the children and families in your program and remove anything that promotes stereotypes, such as store-bought posters. Instead have the children make their own posters with pictures or items that are important to them. If your group isn’t diverse use images from your community or elsewhere in the country. Add culturally authentic toys and materials that reflect the cultures of the families and children—books, dolls, toys, wall decorations, even music and dances. Show people in nontraditional roles, people of color in leadership positions, people with disabilities doing familiar activities. 
  • See every child through a strength-based lens and talk positively about each child’s physical characteristics and cultural heritage. 
  • Let children know that unjust things can be changed. Encourage them to challenge bias and involve them in taking action on issues relevant to their lives.
  • Discuss similarities and differences in the children in your group. It’s these differences that make us unique. Framing difference as a good thing encourages children to feel safe and more comfortable asking questions and talking about differences. 

References

American Psychological Association (2020, August 27). Children notice race several years before adults want to talk about it. https://www.apa.org/topics/equity-diversity-inclusion

Armstrong, A. (2019, June 4). Bias starts as early as preschool, but can be unlearned. https://edutopia.org/article/bias-starts-early-preschool-can-be-unlearned/

Biles, B. (1994). Activities that promote racial and cultural awareness. National Network for Child Care. In C.M. Todd (Ed.). Family child care connections4(3), 1-4. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Cooperative Extension Service.

Meltzoff, A. N. & Gilliam, W. S. (Winter 2024). Young children and implicit racial biases. Daedalus153(1), 65-83.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (1999). Teaching young children to resist bias. https://www.pbs.org/kcts/preciouschildren/diversity/read_teaching.html#:~:text=Give%20them%20tools%20to%20confront,%2C%20comics%2C%20and%20on%20TV.

Perszyk, D. R., Lei, R. F., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A., & Waxman, S. R. (2019, January 23). Bias at the intersection of race and gender: Evidence from preschool-aged children. Developmental Science22(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12788

Rizzo, M. T., Britton, T. C., & Rhodes, M. (2022, November). Developmental origins of anti-Black bias in white children in the United States: Exposure to and beliefs about racial inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119(47): ezz09129119.

Rizzo, M. T., Green, E. R., Dunham, Y., Bruneau, E., & Rhodes, M. (2021, August). Beliefs about social norms and racial inequalities predict variation in the early development of racial bias. Developmental Science25(2).

Rucinski, C. (2023). EmbraceRace’s 2023 Reflections on racial learning. https://www.embracerace.org/community/reflections-on-childrens-racial-learning

Sullivan, J., Wilton, L., & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2021, February). Adults delay conversations about race because they underestimate children’s processing of race. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2): 395-400. https//doi.org/10.1037/xge0000851


Helping Young Children Cope with War

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

The Russians invaded Ukraine early in 2022. Astonishingly, we barely remember that since then they have removed and “adopted” more than 16,000 Ukrainian children ranging in age from 2 to 17 years, very few of whom have been returned to their families.

 In contrast, it is impossible to forget about the horrors of the war in Israel and Gaza. Perhaps this is partly because we know more about some of the children affected—babies, toddlers, and preschoolers who’ve been killed or taken hostage—who inevitably come to mind whenever we see the news or spend time with our own children or the children we teach. 

Children are vulnerable

Does this mean that the children in our daily lives are also more aware of this war? Do they overhear adult conversations about it and become upset if their family and friends are afraid or anxious or angry or sad as a result? Do they see images of destruction and identify with Aviv Asher, the 3½-year-girl or her 5-year-old brother who are now among the 20 to 30 children being held in Gaza by Hamas? Do they believe they’re also in danger even though the war is far away?

The answer to these questions is probably yes. Children feel vulnerable because they depend on the adults in their lives to help them feel safe. They are too often nearby when someone is watching the news on a phone or television or Facebook page or when their families or teachers are discussing the situation, no matter how softly they speak. Children pay close attention to our facial expressions and tone of voice as they search for clues about how to manage their own emotions and behavior. Even if they don’t ask questions about what’s going on, we must talk with them about their thoughts and feelings so that we can help them feel safer and more secure and give them guidance.

 Talking with the children

We can prepare for such conversations by taking care of ourselves, being informed about what’s happening, and sharing our own feelings with people we love and trust so that we have the patience and creativity we need. The American Psychiatric Association counsels us to start by asking the children what they’ve heard and what they think is happening, to listen calmly and carefully to what they say, to answer their questions honestly, and to follow their lead without judgment. We must give them the chance to tell us their worries.

It’s all right for us to say how we feel, to cry and be sad. If we don’t let the children know that it’s okay to feel sad and scared, they may think something is wrong with them when they have these feelings or they may hide what they feel and refuse to speak because they’ve concluded that the events are too dangerous to discuss. 

What children need most is to feel safe, and our goal should be to create a safe place and protect them. Young children probably do not realize how far away Israel and Gaza are and fear that what’s happening there might happen to them, too. During 9/11, the news repeatedly showed the same plane hitting the towers in New York, but each time the children saw this news clip they thought that it was a different plane and a different tower. It was no wonder they believed their parents were in danger when they went to work. 

Again, it’s important to find out what the children know and what they need to know. We must validate their feelings, reassure and comfort them, and give them lots of hugs and kisses and as much one-on-one time as they need. Be sure they know that they can talk with a teacher or another trusted adult at any time—and then, if they take us up on this promise, we must be sure to make ourselves available!

Parents and other family members may not realize what’s appropriate for their child to know. Help them understand that they need to limit what they watch and talk about in their children’s presence no matter where they’re getting their news. Their primary job is to make sure their children know that they’ll take care of them and keep them safe.

Keep your eyes open

At the same time it’s imperative for you to observe the children carefully, looking for signs of fear or anxiety, noticing if they’re more clingy and whiney than usual, need extra hugs, or are short tempered, aggressive, eating or sleeping badly, or more prone than usual to toilet accidents, stomach aches, or thumbsucking. Listen and watch to figure out what each child needs, keeping in mind that challenging behavior is a way of asking for help. 

Some children react immediately; others may take weeks to show anger, fear, or sadness. Boys may act aggressively, while girls are more likely to talk about their feelings. Children who’ve experienced trauma in the past, those who have loved ones in the region, and those with a condition like autism are more likely to need extra comfort and support.  

What else can you do?

  • Get back to your routines as quickly as possible. They provide everyone with a sense that life is predictable and consistent.  
  • Remember that play is one of the best ways for children to express their feelings. Among other things, it can give them a chance to repeat scenes over and over, providing them with a sense of power. After 9/11, children built towers in the block area and knocked them down with planes. Hard as that may have been for teachers to watch, it was important for the children to do. In the current situation they may engage in pretend war play, even taking hostages.
  • Drawing, painting, dancing, dramatic play, and writing are also effective outlets for children’s feelings.
  • Tactile play with sand, water, or play dough as well as yoga, meditation, and mindfulness  help to reduce stress.
  • Activities that focus on social and emotional development enable the children to learn to respect and take care of others. 
  • The NAEYC suggests creating projects where they can help others deal with a traumatic event, for example by making cookies or get well cards for hospital patients. This war offers an opportunity to teach children the importance of helping one another.
  • Fred Rogers reminds us to focus on the helpers—police, firefighters, nurses, paramedics, and other people around the world who are working to stop the conflict and bring peace. 

Where Did That Behavior Come From? 

What COVID-19 Taught Preschoolers  

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

The outbreak of COVID-19 has produced a collective trauma in our world, and one result is that  everyone is worrying about its catastrophic effects on student learning.

In addition to walloping the math and reading scores of middle and high schoolers, over the past three years school closures and remote learning have hurt students’ mental health and well-being, causing stress, anxiety, depression, and even suicidal thoughts and attempts. Children of color and those from low-income families have been especially hard hit, with their test results declining twice as much as those in wealthy neighborhoods.

What about preschoolers?

But our youngest children are dealing with an even tougher situation. The early years are a crucial time, the period of life when the brain is developing most quickly and shapes adult outcomes the most. As a collective trauma, COVID has caused toxic stress and trauma in children, families, and educators. In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Surgeon General have warned that the pandemic created a national emergency in child mental health.

Without the company of peers and warm, responsive teachers, young children’s social development has suffered severely, and when they finally returned to their child care centers, preschools, elementary schools, and after-school programs, their teachers found that their speech and language were far below normal for their age. 

Their behavior was, too. The children bit, hit, and bullied one another, and they didn’t know how to play, share, take turns, make friends, resolve conflicts, pay attention, follow directions, or control their impulses—all things that children usually learn in their early years. 

Instead, they were unmotivated, irritable, overwhelmed, and lacking in self-confidence, and they cried, withdrew, or became clingy, easily frustrated, or subject to temper tantrums as they struggled with personal touch, big groups, and separation anxiety.  

In one study, 53 percent of early childhood educators observed behavioral changes during the pandemic and 77 percent of them characterized the changes as negative. Here is some of what they found.

The children:

  • Easily lost control or became angry or upset 
  • Had more temper tantrums
  • Behaved in ways that were more unpredictable, oppositional, volatile, and extreme  
  • Gave up even on small tasks that presented any challenge 
  • Had difficulty concentrating
  • Lost self-help skills
  • Had trouble with transitions
  • Were sad or cried
  • Couldn’t process social information and reacted defensively and aggressively when they thought they were being blamed or attacked
  • Struggled to get along with others; everything was “me” or “mine”

Children who had lost loved ones had the most difficulty. But they were joined by children who lived in cramped spaces with stressed parents who had lost their jobs and were trying to manage on a reduced income. Lacking adequate technology, routines, and access to exercise and mental health care, these children had learned that the world is a dangerous place and that someone they love might get sick and die. Experts believe that these lessons could stay with them for years, increasing the probability that they will drop out of school and have problems with the police unless they have a supportive adult in their lives and the opportunity to build their resilience. 

Teachers have suffered, too

If you have had a hard time at work, you are not alone: The pandemic affected educators deeply. In one survey of teachers, more than 70 percent reported feeling sad, angry, or anxious. In addition to fearing they would catch COVID, they were burned out—overworked and overwhelmed. Teaching online made them feel isolated, depressed, and ineffective. Fifty percent said they were likely to quit or retire early because of job stress.  And predictably, children in the care of teachers with these feelings were more prone to perform poorly and present behavior problems.

 Children who are dealing with toxic stress and trauma are difficult to teach, and their teachers, who are also experiencing the high cortisol levels associated with these conditions, may find it all too easy to misinterpret a child’s challenging, negative behavior. What looks like defiance may actually be distraction; what seems like disrespect or anger may be depression or pain; and anxiety may present itself as anger, avoidance, or even a stomach ache or a need to use the bathroom.

What can you do about this?

As an educator, you may be (or have been) depressed by the isolation and loneliness the pandemic inflicted on us; or anxious, wondering if your every symptom is COVID or worrying about your financial situation; or grieving if you’ve been unlucky enough to lose a loved one. You may be finding it hard to concentrate and make decisions, or still be feeling unsafe and avoiding crowded public places like restaurants.

 But because the children you teach take their cues from you, it’s important to manage your stress and strengthen your resilience. Here are some tips about how you can do that:

  • Exercise.
  • Stick to a routine.
  • Limit the time you spend on television and social media that has anything to do with COVID and look instead for good and hopeful news.
  • Do something you’ve wanted to do but never had time for—plant a small garden, try a new recipe, take up hiking or pickleball.
  • Connect with others—family members, organizations, old friends or new—where you may find support. Just like the children we care for, we get power from our relationships.
  • Try to figure out what causes your stress and consider healthier ways to manage it. Instead of eating that chocolate bar, try going for a run.  
  • Look for strengths you didn’t know you had, and nurture hope, a positive view of your own strengths, and your ability to develop through effort. 

When you encounter challenging behavior

It’s essential to try to understand what children are feeling underneath their challenging behavior. Then it becomes possible for you to empathize, connect with them, and respond to their needs.

First and foremost, they must feel physically and psychologically safe. As Alfie Kohn tells us, “When children feel safe, they can take risks, ask questions, make mistakes, learn to trust, share their feelings, and grow.”

The most important element in a safe environment is a nurturing, positive, and stable relationship with the teacher, namely you. Children learn through relationships—through cuddling, eye contact, smiles, gestures, and responses to their own movements and sounds. Above all, they need lots of conversation because contact with others is how they learn about emotions and how to manage them.

Remember that trauma-related behavior often begins with anxiety, so reach out early by smiling or nodding or asking, “Are you okay?” or “Would you like some help?” Encourage children to identify and tap into their feelings while you stay calm, gentle, and positive. Instead of asking yourself, “What’s wrong with this child?” ask “What’s happened to this child?”

Here are some reminders of what else teachers can provide:

  • Rich experiences that stimulate and enrich brain growth
  • Consistent, predictable routines
  • Advance warnings
  • Proactive lessons in social and emotional skills
  • Quiet areas away from active areas
  • Dramatic, creative, free-play opportunities
  • Tasks broken into smaller chunks and help in mastering them
  • Opportunities to make choices, learn to solve problems, and practice making plans
  • Positive attention when children are behaving appropriately 

Don’t forget that you are a role model for positive relationships. Respond promptly when children are distressed and listen carefully to everything they have to say. Be mindful, kind, and accepting. And remember to show appreciation for what they can do, instead of paying attention to what they cannot do.

 We’d like to hear about how you’ve been managing in the pandemic. Does this ring true for you, or have you had a very different experience?

Tags: COVID-19, pandemic, young children, social-emotional development, early childhood educators, challenging behavior, relationships


What’s Happening in Nashville?

Guns Are Everywhere

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

In Nashville, the police did everything right, yet six people—three adults and three 9-year-olds—died at Covenant School anyway.

Thanks to regular rehearsals with the fire department, medical staff, dispatchers, and others (the latest practice only a week before the shooting), the police force was prepared for the shooter. It took them just 14 minutes from the time of the first 911 call to track down and kill the assailant, a 28-year-old former student at the school.

The police were clearly remembering what had happened in May in Uvalde, Texas, where 19 children and two teachers perished while police waited more than an hour to confront the gunman. “We knew we couldn’t wait,” said Chief John Drake of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department. 

Their performance was textbook perfect. But it couldn’t prevent the deaths, and the citizens of Nashville let everyone know how upset and angry they were. More than a thousand of them—high school and college students, elementary school children and their parents, mothers with toddlers, ordinary people—marched on the Tennessee Capitol, demanding tighter gun laws.

With signs that read “We want to live through high school,”  “Book bags not body bags,” and “2nd graders over 2nd Amendment,” they asked why their Republican legislators were extending greater access to firearms than any other state was providing. Inside the legislature itself, three Democratic lawmakers demonstrated for gun control and two of them were ousted from their jobs, unleashing protests nationwide.

What is happening to our country?

So far this year there have already been at least 163 mass shootings (defined as four or more fatalities, not including the perpetrator). Fourteen of these were school shootings, according to the Gun Violence Archive. We have seen more mass shootings than days in 2023.

We are living with the reality that firearms are the leading cause of death in children aged 1 to 19. Violence seems to have become a suitable way to handle problems. People are being shot in banks, grocery stores, Sweet Sixteen parties, for merely chasing a basketball into a neighbor’s yard or knocking on the wrong door or turning a car around in the wrong driveway. 

What could account for this?

One possible explanation might be that we are suffering from the effects of three long years of Covid 19 with its lockdowns, illness, and deaths, as well as inflation and the loss of now expiring government supports. The result is that our stress response—the body’s normal way of dealing with danger—is totally out of whack. 

Its job is to protect us from danger by secreting the hormone cortisol, which enables the body to deal with threats instantly. Cortisol triggers the fight, flight, and freeze reaction, mobilizing heart rate, blood pressure, glucose, and muscle tone. When the danger has passed, the stress response usually shuts down and returns the brain and the body to their normal calm state. 

But when there is trauma or toxic stress—when fear is chronic and stress is unmanageable, intense, frequent, sizeable, and/or prolonged—the stress response does not shut down. It continues to feel unsafe and remains on hyperalert, suspicious of the environment. This state of affairs changes the brain and affects relationships, sensory processing, learning, and behavior.

Most of us have no idea that this could be happening. We don’t recognize the symptoms of trauma and toxic stress in ourselves or in the children we care for who seem unable to control their behavior: We are all exhausted, jumpy, easily overwhelmed, unable to concentrate, sad, spacey, unpredictable, defensive, even aggressive. 

If we are struggling with our own behavior, imagine how hard it is for these children with their high cortisol levels. We can’t support them unless we can understand our own stress levels and regulate our own emotions. People who can’t control their own responses just react. If a gun is nearby, they may use it, especially if its use is habitual. 

What else could cause this explosion of aggression?

This violent behavior has another much more obvious explanation: the omnipresence of guns, all kinds of guns—but especially AR-15 rifles and handguns with high-capacity magazines that enable people to do more killing in a shorter time and which fire “bullets at such a high velocity — often in a barrage of 30 or even 100 in rapid succession — [that]. . . a single bullet lands with a shock wave intense enough to blow apart a skull and demolish vital organs.” 

In many states, including Tennessee, some of these weapons are available to just about anyone who wants them, no age limit, no mandatory permit, no background check required, no red flag rules that enable police to confiscate guns from anyone who presents a danger to himself or others, no laws that ensure guns are properly locked up. After all, the Nashville shooter was able to purchase seven guns and rifles legally.

Such restrictions seem to be happening only in our dreams. And after a shooting, contrary to what we might think, states expand access to guns, although researchers have repeatedly found that “a gun in the house makes people more likely to be murdered, not less,” as the New York Times put it.

What can we do in this situation?

The police are doing their part. Now we have to persuade politicians to do theirs and ban assault weapons. We do not live in a war zone; we do not need them. Instead of loosening gun laws after a shooting, we should be tightening them. 

Let us applaud and join the 162 mayors who just sent a letter to Congress urging action on gun safety legislation. “How many children must die, how many adults must die before our nation takes action to reduce gun violence?” they wrote. “We must and we can do more to protect people from this senseless slaughter…. The time for Congress to act is now. Our children deserve better.”


Teachers and Guns

by Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

Thanks to the New York Times, we’ve just learned that 29 states permit educators to bring guns to into their schools. Some people seem to think that arming teachers can be a solution to school shootings, even if the teachers have little training.

The Times asks educators what they think of this. If you’re a teacher of very young children, you may feel this has little to do with you, but we urge you to think of Sandy Hook and remember that there have been 40 school shootings this year.

This article is an interview with Utah County Sheriff Mike Smith, a law enforcement officer for 28 years. He first zeroed in on school shootings in 1999, when Columbine made all of us aware of what they can do.

After Smith discovered that teachers were bringing guns into their classrooms and leaving them unsecured, he decided to help them understand what arming themselves means and prepare them at least a little for a school shooting situation. His 6-week course, Teacher’s Academy, attracts teachers at all levels and currently has a waiting list.

Listen to the podcast of this interview here, read the Times story here, and participate in the Times questionnaire here (if you’d like to).

Listen to the podcast and read the article before you complete the questionnaire.


Can Early Childhood Educators Curb School Shootings?

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky  

School shootings are very much with us, and no matter how hard we try, we can’t get them out of our heads. 

 First and foremost, we remember the terrible number of children and teachers killed and injured in a total of 35 school shootings in the U.S. so far this year. But school shootings affect us all, especially the teachers and children who must go to school and child care every day and the families who worry about them. School shootings have demolished our sense of safety.

What can we do about this?

Although schools across the country hold drills on lockdown procedures, there is no good evidence that they work, and they often evoke anxiety and stress instead of serenity. More important is a supportive, nurturing school environment—something teachers constantly strive to create and which is even more essential now.

In the meantime, we have begun to wonder if there is any other way that early childhood educators and K-to-12 teachers can have an impact on this epidemic. Can we help to prevent future shootings? Can we somehow reach and influence the children who might turn into school shooters and divert them from this path? Can we point them in a different direction? If so, how?

A Secret Service analysis tells us more about school shooters:

  • They are mostly young men. The shooter in Uvalde, TX, was 19.
  • They have histories of school discipline problems and contact with law enforcement.
  • They have experienced bullying or mental health issues such as depression and suicidality.
  • They have used drugs or alcohol.
  • As young children they suffered from adverse childhood experiences, otherwise known as ACEs.

The last item on this list jumps out at us: That is, it tells us that during the first five years of their lives, at a time when their brains were establishing crucial connections, these children were very likely living with chronic, prolonged neglect and/or physical, emotional, or sexual abuse; witnessing or being subjected to violence; or in the care of adults who had mental health problems, including depression and problems with substance abuse, who were incarcerated or otherwise absent, or who were experiencing poverty, food scarcity, and/or homelessness. 

As a result, these children didn’t have a secure attachment to their primary caregiver. And if no caring adult was there to love, protect, and support them through these difficult events, they were living with high levels of toxic stress—which amounts to trauma. The more adverse childhood experiences in their lives, the higher their risk for social, emotional, and cognitive delays that could harm them for life.

How can we possibly fight ACEs?

To protect a child in a dangerous situation, the body immediately activates the stress system’s fight, flee, or freeze response and sends in the stress hormones cortisol and adrenaline. Under normal circumstances, when the threat disappears the stress system returns to a calm, relaxed state.

But if a threat is too long-lasting or intensive and the child has no caring adult to help him or her deal with it, the stress system responds more often and for longer periods than is necessary. As a result, the developing brain is overloaded with toxic levels of cortisol that disrupt its functioning, and the child is constantly on high alert.

For children who’ve been maltreated like this, the world feels like a dangerous place, and they arm themselves with challenging behavior. They believe that they deserve poor treatment and push away any adult who tries to love and accept them. Oppositional, defiant behavior is their way to communicate their fear and distress. It is a cry for help.

Under these circumstances, it’s no wonder that their teachers become angry and frustrated.

You can make a difference

But a teacher’s best response to their behavior is not to yell or use time-out or take away privileges or suspend the child. Rather it is essential for teachers to remain calm and compassionate and use their empathy, energy, and ingenuity to build a relationship with each child. Above all, they must not to take this behavior personally.

As trauma expert Barbara Sorrels tells us in Reaching and Teaching Children Exposed to Trauma, “Children who have been harmed in the context of relationship can only be healed in a relationship…. It is the ongoing, daily interactions with loving, emotionally responsive and caring adults…that bring about healing…. Because child care providers and teachers often spend more waking hours with a child than any other adult they are key players in the path to healing” (2015, 8-9). 

How can teachers change their perspective?

The teachers’ point of view should not be “What’s wrong with this child?” but rather “What’s happened to this child?”

 Instead of pushing the child away, says Sorrels, the teacher’s words and actions should convey that “We will love you through this unlovely behavior and help you to find new ways of behaving.”

Think of trauma-informed practice as best practice. The idea is to create a safe space where all children, especially those who’ve been traumatized, can learn to trust, where they feel respected, protected, and unconditionally accepted, where they believe they are valued, that they matter, that they are important to others, and that others will support them.

Strengthening relationships 

In addition to some of the tactics teachers are probably already using—such as having a predictable schedule with as few transitions as possible—here are some strategies Sorrels recommends to improve relationships with children with challenging behavior:

  • Offer choices throughout the day so that children feel that they have some control over their lives.
  • Teach children to ask for a compromise. This is a way for them to learn to express their needs and interests and regain their voice. Teachers can help them practice using role plays or puppets.
  • Help children to see conflict as a problem to be solved, not as an opportunity to fight.
  • Catch children being good by tuning into their interests and abilities. Talk less and listen more.
  • Try do-overs, i.e., ask the child to replace inappropriate behavior with appropriate behavior—but make sure to explain what appropriate behavior is. Again, puppets and role plays are useful.
  • To help a wound-up child to unwind, use slow, deliberate movement, quiet talk and singing, and gentle touch (but be sure to ask the child’s permission first). Talk about what both of you are feeling.
  • Do not try to restrain a child without the direction and supervision of an expert. This can be dangerous.

Such a calm, caring approach reassures children that it’s all right to have strong emotions and these uneasy feelings won’t hurt their relationship with their teacher. They may even learn to tolerate them. 

As a bonus, this attitude keeps the teacher from triggering the child’s stress response and escalating the challenging behavior.  

The most amazing thing is that, used with patience and perseverance, this response can slowly change the way young children behave. That is, by improving their ability to deal with the stress in their lives, teachers can prevent them from acquiring some of the behavioral history described by the Secret Service and even stop them from eventually becoming school shooters.  


The Tragedy in Uvalde

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

Like other teachers and parents all over North America, we are grieving for the families in Uvalde, TX—and angry that such events continue to happen.

We have two important questions.

  • First, what can we do now, in the present, to help one another and the children we care for to live with this trauma and its aftermath (besides turning off the television)?

Here is some advice from experts:

https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/18/09/helping-teachers-manage-weight-trauma

https://www.pbs.org/parents/thrive/helping-children-with-tragic-events-in-the-news

https://www.apa.org/topics/gun-violence-crime/shooting-aftermath

  • The second question—what can we do to stop this violence?—is almost impossible to answer. But the short answer is this: When you vote in any election, be it local or national, write or call the candidates to find out their views on gun control. Remember that the shooters in Uvalde and Buffalo were both just 18 years old.

Celebrating Difference: How Culture Shapes Your Expectations and Children’s Behavior

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

Black History Month may be over, but we need its lessons all year long—this year more than ever. 

The death of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and others shook us up and sent us out to protest in streets all over America. As a result, their deaths led to important victories over hate crime in the courts.

But if we as a country are going to deal successfully with hate and racism, we’d be well advised to begin at the beginning—with young children, who may already be developing bias before the age of 5.  For teachers that means recognizing our own biases and understanding how they impact our attitudes and behavior.

 Like the children in our care, every teacher is different. We come from different contexts and cultures, and everything we think, say, and do is processed through the filter of our own culture. Culture affects more than just food and holidays. It influences our values and beliefs, our gender roles, family structures, language, dress, etiquette, approach to disability, child-rearing practices, communication—and yes, our teaching style.

But because culture is not explicitly taught but is instead silently absorbed from birth onward and passed down from generation to generation, we’re seldom aware of how it shapes our identity and provides us with ground rules for interpreting and acting in the world. Even very experienced teachers probably don’t realize how their unconscious attitudes guide their interactions with children, their expectations, and their appreciation of children’s skills, abilities, and behavior.

What lens are you looking through?

Needless to say, children also see and understand the world through the lens of their culture, which may be different from ours. This makes it essential for us to see and understand our own culture. Only then can we comprehend how the cultures of the children we teach influence their behavior. And only then can we give every child a fair chance to succeed.

Think about it: In what ways has your culture determined who you are today? How were you required to behave when you were a child? What were the adult-child relationships like in your family? What behavior was expected in your school? How has your upbringing influenced your view of children’s behavior and your connection with their families?

Your culture also dictates how you communicate with others. Do you listen carefully, or do you interrupt? Do you stand close to the person you’re addressing or far away? Do you gesture or do you touch one another? Are you comfortable talking about feelings? Do you think not just about what you’re saying but also about how you’re saying it and how your message is being received?

What lenses filter children’s behavior?

Most children don’t come to child care or school knowing what you expect them to do, and you may not be aware of their cultural and behavioral expectations at home. But each child brings his or her own set of culturally based scripts, skills, talents, and values into the classroom.             

Children begin to construct their identity from understanding their place in their own family and culture and by responding to how others relate to them. To form a positive self-concept, children must honor and respect their own family and culture and have others honor and respect them too. If your classroom doesn’t reflect and validate the culture of the children you teach, they are likely to feel invisible, unimportant, incompetent, worthless, and ashamed of who they are.

But when you use culturally competent teaching strategies, children do not have to change who they are in order to fit in. Your teaching style, expectations, and program take every child’s culture and learning style into consideration.

Bear in mind that what children know when they first enter your classroom is a reflection of the opportunities they’ve had and the skills they’ve needed to function within their own cultural group. It doesn’t indicate what they’re capable of doing and learning.

The world’s lens

Anthropologists look at culture in terms of individual versus group orientation. People in most of the world have different cultural values from White European Americans, but our schools and early childhood centers utilize and teach European American values: individualism, independence, self-direction, initiative, and competitiveness. 

However, other cultures emphasize interdependence—being closely connected, first and foremost part of a community where self-esteem is based on contributions to the good of the whole, not on individual achievement. 

These different cultural orientations have clear implications for teaching young children and clarify why children from diverse cultures may have trouble learning, understanding the rules, and following directions. These differences can appear in instruction, language, and behaviors, such as moving around in class, shouting out thoughts during circle or meeting time, placing the trains and the blocks in the same bin at clean-up, chatting with a neighbor during nap, and going to the bathroom without permission. 

Although these behaviors are usually unacceptable in a White European American classroom, they may be totally normal and acceptable in the child’s home culture. As a result of these differences, in many cases the teacher sees the children through a deficit-based lens and treats them as disruptive or attention seeking.


Cultural Misunderstanding

Play time is over. You say, “Joey, can you please put away the blocks?” 

Joey replies, “No.” 

You think he’s being defiant, but the truth is probably different. In almost every non-European American culture, parents don’t ask their children to do something. They tell them straight out what to do: “Joey, put away the blocks.”

Look again at that request of yours. It was in the form of a question. Joey honestly believes that you’re giving him a choice and it’s up to him to decide what he’ll do. 

So is this child being insolent? And what do you think you should you do?  


Pitfalls

 As you get to know your own culture you may begin to recognize some troublesome areas.

Microaggressions. More than just insults or insensitive comments, microaggressions are specific remarks, questions, or actions that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages based on a person’s group membership. They seem to be compliments or jokes, but in reality they contain a hidden insult. Part of what makes them so disconcerting is that they occur casually, frequently, and often without intentional harm. In an early childhood setting, a typical microaggression frames children’s differences as deficits rather than assets (“We don’t do it that way here” when a child wants to do something the way she does it at home) or mispronounces or substitutes a child’s name (“Your name is so hard to pronounce. Can I call you Mary?”). 

Implicit bias. All of us have implicit biases—that is, automatic, unconscious stereotypes that form as a result of our upbringing, daily experiences, and media exposure and drive the way we take in information, judge situations and people, and make decisions. Despite the fact that they influence us at least as much as our explicit biases, they are called “implicit” because most of the time we don’t know they’re there.

Implicit bias is one of the reasons that young African American children—especially boys—are suspended and expelled from school and child care at a much higher rate than young White children. An experiment by Yale psychologist Walter S. Gilliam revealed that teachers often expect Black boys to misbehave because of their race, an assumption that is completely false.  

 Fortunately, with conscious effort we can reduce our implicit biases by recognizing them, using self-reflection, empathy, and mindfulness, and learning new information about children’s families and cultures. To check out your own biases, take the Harvard Bias Test

Structural racism. Racism is not just the result of individual bias but is actually systemic and part of our culture. That is, it’s embedded in our laws, policies, and institutions—our schools, criminal justice system, electoral system, health care, housing, military, water supply, socio-economic status, and more—and has been since the United States was founded. The racism and inequities that people of color face today are the legacy of our country’s structure and its history of slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws.

Inequitable opportunities, privileges, and life experience based on economic class deeply affect young children’s lives. Although a family’s income doesn’t determine how much they love their child or how skilled they are at parenting, poverty can make the fundamental necessities for their children’s healthy growth and development (such as safe housing, nutritious food, regular health care) very difficult or impossible to get. How does this reality impact your relationship with the children and their families, the opportunities you offer, and your expectations of children’s ability and behavior? What can you do to change things?

Cross cultural competence

Understanding your own culture and the culture of the children you teach offers an important step toward better care and learning. So how can you acquire this understanding?

Cross cultural competence is something we all should be striving for. It is the key to working effectively with all children and their families and requires us to:

–be self aware—to understand ourselves, our culture, our biases, and our level of curiosity about getting to know others

–have an open attitude and awareness of others and be able to appreciate differences as well as similarities

–develop a knowledge and understanding of the cultures of the children and families we teach

–be able to adapt our communication and teaching style to different individuals, groups, and cultures

Cross cultural competence is an asset-based approach. At its heart is the belief that every child is unique and interacts differently with the world, and it embraces the idea that all children have knowledge, beliefs, and patterns of interaction that teachers can build on to teach new concepts and skills. 

So how do we recognize and teach children with different skills, knowledge, and abilities if what they’ve learned so far in their home culture doesn’t apply to ours? Your interest shows you care about them. When you make positive observations and ask questions about things that are unique to them, you help them to become more open to learning.

Equitable is an adjective that means fair or impartial, and equitable practice means providing the support that each child and family need. Equity in early childhood education requires eliminating obstacles to opportunity regardless of children’s gender, family background, language, and economic status. Knowing each child’s preferences and strengths will allow you to offer a program that reinforces and integrates the children’s interests and strengths. Do you know what engages each child? Where each one’s talents lie? Whether they feel comfortable in structured settings? In large or small groups?

Families are a powerful source of information—they naturally pass along the ways that people in their culture use to survive and succeed. Children’s interactions with their family often act as the archetype of how to behave by demonstrating a variety of cultural rules, expectations, and taboos. Try to find out what’s important to each family—their cultural norms, values, traditions, and goals. What do they want their child to learn?

It is up to you to ensure that children think differences are positive. Spend time modeling and teaching them how to notice, appreciate, and support others. Fill your shelves with books featuring diverse children and families and encourage open discussion about the similarities and differences among the children in the class. Teach them that it is our differences that make us special. 

Be aware of the children’s interactions. Are they treating each other differently based on race, ethnicity, or gender? Work with them to resolve the issue and use these situations to inspire your story selection, activities, and projects. When the children know that difference is a good thing, they feel more comfortable asking questions and talking about the differences they notice in themselves and in the people in their lives. And when you discuss race, ethnicity, disabilities, LGBTQ families, and even issues like weight and poverty, you are working to prevent biases from forming. 

Understanding the impact of your own cultural background as well as that of the children is a process, and it will take time to recognize and work through your patterns of thinking. The ultimate objective is to make sure that every child comes away with a strong sense of self-awareness and pride in who he or she is.


What Does Critical Race Theory Have to Do with Early Childhood Education?

By Barbara Kaiser and Judy Sklar Rasminsky

You’ve probably heard of critical race theory (CRT for short), and you may even know that it’s causing shouting matches and threats of violence in meetings of school boards across the country—school boards that are recalling and replacing their members in record numbers. 

Why are they so upset, and why is this such a contentious issue? 

When civil rights reforms like Brown v. Board of Education (1954) failed to eliminate racial inequality in the United States by the 1970s, academics at law schools wanted to know why. Their conclusion, now known as CRT, was that racism is not just the result of individual bias but is actually systemic. That is, racism is embedded in our laws, policies, and institutions—our schools, criminal justice system, elections, economy, health care, housing, military, water supply, and more—and has been since the United States was founded. The racism and inequities that people of color face today are the legacy of our country’s structure and its history of slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws. 

This notion of systemic, structural racism displeases many conservatives, from Tucker Carlson to former President Trump to parents fed up with the pandemic and angry at having their children out of school. Although CRT remains an academic subject taught almost exclusively in higher education, they have misinterpreted it and turned it into a catchall phrase for any initiative that advocates improving outcomes for children of color in elementary, middle, and high schools. 

Many states are passing laws to outlaw what they are calling CRT; banning books, culturally responsive teaching, restorative justice, social emotional learning, and curricula that focus on different cultures; curtailing training to reduce implicit bias; and forbidding anything that could make White students feel “discomfort or guilt” because of their race or sex. 

But what does CRT have to do with child care? 

But, you may ask, how does this affect young children? Why would we teach 3- and 4-year-olds about slavery? And yet, because eliminating racism and inequality is so important, some schools are doing just that. 

Learning about racism and inequity has become more urgent since the death of George Floyd and many others and the Black Lives Matter movement has taken hold. But schools, school districts, early childhood organizations, and early childhood centers nationwide recognized some time ago that children of color were being treated unequally, and the profession began taking steps to remedy the situation. In 2019, the National Association for the Education of Young Children adopted a position statement on advancing equity in early childhood education, and Exchange Press put out “Focus on Race.” This year the NAEYC published a comprehensive book on the subject, Advancing Equity and Embracing Diversity in Early Childhood Education.

Children pick up clues about race and racial bias from their environment at an early age. At 3 months, babies prefer people who are the same color as their caregivers, and by 4 or 5 years White children may say they don’t want to have friends who are Black. As they get older, children hear biased remarks on the bus and in the classroom, see racial violence on television, observe that everyone in their school is the same color, note that there are very few people of color in their textbooks and among their teachers, and may even notice that when a Black child and a White child commit the same infraction, the Black child is more likely to be suspended.

All of this is very confusing, and the research shows that colorblindness is not a solution. The issue is not about avoiding differences; it is about appreciating them. Although some educators want to restrict discussion of race and racism, many others believe it is their job to teach children to be critical thinkers and understand the world. Without help, children may invent their own false explanations of what’s happening, for instance that children of color are suspended because they aren’t as smart as White children. On the other hand, open conversations about race can reduce prejudice in White children and raise self-esteem in children of color.

  

Tackling Race

Many teachers need training and practice in focusing on racial issues in the classroom, says Diane Hughes, Professor of Applied Psychology at New York University. She and other experts provide these tips:

  • Talk about race directly, not just about equality and kindness. Be intentional about what you want children to know. Frankness helps them to identify bias more easily. (An activity for young children might be one where they mix paint to create a color that looks like their own skin color. When they paint their hands with it, they can see how it matches and realize that everyone’s skin is a different color.)  
  • Choose and discuss books, videos, and movies with characters from many backgrounds. When all the characters are White, say so and ask why. Why doesn’t this represent our world? What was the writer thinking? Who has power and who doesn’t? Who is missing from the story?
  • Create opportunities for children of different races to learn about each other and respect the gifts each of them brings to the classroom.
  • If children make racist comments, ask them for more information before you respond. What did they mean? What did they think they were saying? Where did they learn to say this?

What can we teach?

Under new state laws, talk of race and racism may be prohibited. So what can we do? 

We repeat: Early childhood educators aren’t teaching CRT or discussing structural racism, and it isn’t clear when it would be appropriate to introduce these issues. At what age can children grasp them? (It seems unlikely that Piaget and Vygotsky have an answer to this problem.) 

The subject of slavery, for example, is far too complicated to make sense to young children. How could we possibly explain that White people felt they had the right to enslave others? Frighteningly, the result might be that the children pretend to be slaves and slaveowners (as happened in a high school in Traverse City, MI).

As human beings, educators should know about systemic racism. But perhaps what’s even more important for creating equity in the classroom is for teachers to be culturally competent themselves—to be aware of their own culture, of who they are and where they come from and their own implicit biases, as well as the culture of each child they teach. In this way they can build relationships and an inclusive community where all the children feel they belong, thereby enabling everyone, regardless of skin color or cultural background, to feel respected and safe, a necessity for learning.

In actuality, best practice in early childhood that emphasizes social emotional learning is already doing this. ECEs should be—and are—teaching what is essential to creating equity: to respect others and their differences, to recognize and appreciate the differences in the colors of their skin, the languages they speak, and the abilities they have. Early childhood educators can make a difference when they encourage children to recognize everyone’s strengths; when they teach them to empathize, to be kind, to be caring, and to acknowledge and believe that everyone has rights and everyone can make a contribution to society.

Further reading

Strasse, J., & Coplin, L. (2021). Beginning (or continuing) the journey to a more equitable classroom. Teaching Young Children, 14(2). 21-24.

Weir, K. (June 2, 2021). Raising anti-racist children. American Psychological Association, 52(4). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/06/anti-racist-children

Wright, B. L. (2021). Now read this: Books that promote race, identity, agency, and voice. Teaching Young Children, 14(2). 25-27.


Why you work with young children

Just in case you were having doubts about the value of the work you’re doing, read this. It will make you feel valuable and proud.